My test Suggestions
#1
Posted 18 January 2009 - 09:22 PM
#2
Posted 18 January 2009 - 09:48 PM
I plan on going this year; missed last year.
#3
Posted 18 January 2009 - 09:51 PM
#4
Posted 18 January 2009 - 09:52 PM
SnowFlake, on Jan 18 2009, 08:22 PM, said:
what's your test?
if you want to get a lot of breaks - then maybe the colder temps will help.
#5
Posted 18 January 2009 - 09:53 PM
and yes, Gordon and I plan to come down.
#7
Posted 18 January 2009 - 10:07 PM
brycelarson, on Jan 18 2009, 09:52 PM, said:
SnowFlake, on Jan 18 2009, 08:22 PM, said:
what's your test?
if you want to get a lot of breaks - then maybe the colder temps will help.
well you guys decided i think a while back that barrel breaks are caused by loader mistakes or something to that effect. I had a differnt idea
ill be sending you guys the data 100% when im done with video proof and everything so you guys dont claim i facked it cause this is the internet and what not because everyone claims is fake.
but my idea is that the seam of the paintball had more to do with it than anything. My thought is that every now and then the paintball will ether have the seam line up parrel or perpendicular to the bolt and thats what causes the barrel breaks more than anything
ill go in deader detail in my video and what not
i should be able to exsplain it all in there. I know im not a scientist and i know this probly wont change minds but im doing it all under controled ciurcumstances trying to pick out exactly what cause it the most.
#8
Posted 18 January 2009 - 10:14 PM
#9
Posted 19 January 2009 - 09:39 AM
Lord Odin, on Jan 18 2009, 09:14 PM, said:
This really is something that needs to be tested real well, it would just be tedious as hell.
#10
Posted 19 January 2009 - 10:26 AM
Our break test took 10 hours or so to complete - and it involved loading ZERO balls by hand. I look forward to your results - but be warned - it's going to be tedius.
If you have any concerns about your test not being taken seriously - then post up your methodology and we can help you craft a more defensible test.
#11
Posted 19 January 2009 - 10:45 AM
#14
Posted 19 January 2009 - 05:53 PM
#15
Posted 19 January 2009 - 07:08 PM
#16
Posted 19 January 2009 - 07:09 PM
#17
Posted 19 January 2009 - 07:13 PM
#18
Posted 19 January 2009 - 08:48 PM
Personally, I prefer Armageddon, Jungle of Doom, and the woods field. I usually do really well in those.
#19
Posted 19 January 2009 - 11:18 PM
Lord Odin, on Jan 19 2009, 07:48 PM, said:
Personally, I prefer Armageddon, Jungle of Doom, and the woods field. I usually do really well in those.
the town does look fun though. I've never played scenario like that, jus woodsball so it looks fun to me.
#20
Posted 20 January 2009 - 07:35 PM
brycelarson, on Jan 19 2009, 10:26 AM, said:
Our break test took 10 hours or so to complete - and it involved loading ZERO balls by hand. I look forward to your results - but be warned - it's going to be tedius.
If you have any concerns about your test not being taken seriously - then post up your methodology and we can help you craft a more defensible test.
Ok bud thank you so very much

Help




















