amd vs intel can someone explain why intel is better
#1
Posted 08 February 2012 - 12:28 AM
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819103962 150
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819115072 230
same clock speed but 80 bucks difference. i know intel is "hyper threaded" but that whole hyper thread thing sounds a loud of shit. so please explain to me
no "omfg you fucking suck at computers" answers
#3
Posted 08 February 2012 - 12:42 AM
#4
Posted 08 February 2012 - 03:20 AM
the.cheese, on 08 February 2012 - 12:28 AM, said:
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819103962 150
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819115072 230
same clock speed but 80 bucks difference. i know intel is "hyper threaded" but that whole hyper thread thing sounds a loud of shit. so please explain to me
no "omfg you fucking suck at computers" answers
Yes, AMD may be a little cheaper, great for anyone on a budget, but in terms of performance Intel is the way to go.
Just look at the benchmarks..
This post has been edited by MurphMan: 08 February 2012 - 03:24 AM
#5
Posted 08 February 2012 - 07:10 AM
This is why:
http://semiaccurate....single-problem/
Also bulldozer is a new Architecture, that is not nearly as re-find as intel SB.
#6
Posted 08 February 2012 - 09:50 AM
MurphMan, on 08 February 2012 - 03:20 AM, said:
the.cheese, on 08 February 2012 - 12:28 AM, said:
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819103962 150
http://www.newegg.co...N82E16819115072 230
same clock speed but 80 bucks difference. i know intel is "hyper threaded" but that whole hyper thread thing sounds a loud of shit. so please explain to me
no "omfg you fucking suck at computers" answers
Yes, AMD may be a little cheaper, great for anyone on a budget, but in terms of performance Intel is the way to go.
Just look at the benchmarks..
What do ou mean by performance. Performance in my mind is speed and it says they have same clock speed
Benchmark?
#7
Posted 08 February 2012 - 10:10 AM
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/CPU/2
You can see how different chips perform at different benchmark tests (tasks).
This post has been edited by Old Dude PB: 08 February 2012 - 10:10 AM
Pumpbusters' summary of marker efficiency testing
#8
Posted 08 February 2012 - 06:40 PM
#9
Posted 11 February 2012 - 10:15 PM
#10
Posted 11 February 2012 - 11:09 PM
AMD: Not as awesome architectures at a cheap price. Quad cores can potentially rip 6 medium intensity programs to shreds, one high intensity program to shreds.
#11
Posted 14 February 2012 - 12:09 PM
slinkyaroo, on 08 February 2012 - 12:36 AM, said:
I think what the deal is that theyre not going to be investing more money into R&D for home computers but will continue to sell what they have. They are going into mobile technology now if im not mistaken.

ChandlerPB said:

Help




















