TechPB Forum: Cyclone Blowback Test - TechPB Forum

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Cyclone Blowback Test Air source test and affect on velocity

#21 User is offline   navycut81 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 11-February 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury Canada

Posted 10 March 2009 - 02:48 PM

Allright Odin this is what I have come up with so far I have only one test left to do and thats the techt tube with factory cyclone internals

I must say I was very suprised by the results basically in a nut shell the techt upgrades definetly make a huge difference. About a 50 psi difference. The slots allowed the feedrod to work at a lower pressure, the techt tube worked as low as 310 psi But the factory tube wasnt able to go below 360. The Techt tube worked 100% of the time at 338 psi. The factory tube needed to be at more than 420 psi and thats with the techt internals. The factory Tube and internals needed to be atleast above 450 psi.

Unforunatly my pressure gauge only went up to 450 psi I'm going to get another gauge so i can get higher psi readings so i can test the techt tube w/ all factory internals.

If i missed anything or if i did anything wrong let me know and i'll correct redo the test again

Attached File(s)



#22 User is offline   navycut81 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 11-February 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury Canada

Posted 10 March 2009 - 03:00 PM

Oh and all reading were taken off of a 2 inch gauge attached to my palmer regulator at the tombstone w/ remote line and i took a 1 min. break between shots to make sure i didnt freeze my gun up at all

#23 User is offline   cockerpunk 

  • All the Dudes
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 8,702
  • Joined: --
  • Gender:Male


Posted 10 March 2009 - 03:13 PM

well, pressure and energy are not exactly the same thing. its feasible that a lower pressure can still be more energy.
The ultimate truth in paintball is that the interaction between the gun and the player is far and away the largest factor in accuracy, consistency, and reliability.

View Poststicktodrum, on 19 November 2010 - 02:44 PM, said:

And yes, Gordon is the sexiest manifestation of "to the front."

#24 User is offline   navycut81 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 11-February 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury Canada

Posted 10 March 2009 - 03:21 PM

View Postcockerpunk, on Mar 10 2009, 04:13 PM, said:

well, pressure and energy are not exactly the same thing. its feasible that a lower pressure can still be more energy.



LOL well sure "go and cloud the issue with facts and physics" anybody can do that. jk lmao

Is there anything different you would do to test this problem?
Im open to any ideas.

#25 User is offline   Lord Odin 

  • 3 may keep a secret if 2 of them are dead
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Joined: 01-October 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oak Lawn, IL


Posted 10 March 2009 - 03:25 PM

I did another test getting the gun as close to the original velocity but with the Cyclone functioning, got some numbers, then disengaged it. Check the original link.

Navycut, that's really cool. If anything, I would have thought it be reversed. You should share that info with the A5OG and X7OG as well. They love seeing stuff like that, too.

#26 User is offline   navycut81 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 11-February 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sudbury Canada

Posted 10 March 2009 - 03:36 PM

View PostLord Odin, on Mar 10 2009, 04:25 PM, said:

I did another test getting the gun as close to the original velocity but with the Cyclone functioning, got some numbers, then disengaged it. Check the original link.

Navycut, that's really cool. If anything, I would have thought it be reversed. You should share that info with the A5OG and X7OG as well. They love seeing stuff like that, too.



I will post it up there for them. The one thing i was surprised with was how much more psi the stock cyclone needed to turn the cyclone opposed to the fully upgraded TechT one. I think it has more to do with the reduced spring tension inside the ratchet. That the next thing im going to test I think the internal little spring inside the ratchet has alot to do with what pressure the cyclone cycles as well

This post has been edited by navycut81: 10 March 2009 - 03:38 PM


#27 User is offline   Evil Fingers 

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 5,835
  • Joined: 17-October 08
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 16 March 2009 - 04:15 AM

Interesting Thread and a Good Read.

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users