What happened to the Alien Invasion
#21
Posted 03 January 2013 - 07:04 AM
alien guns are fine, they work, they have nice features... but i personally cant support the company based on what i've seen and heard about the owner.... my opinion means nothing in the grand scheme of things, and yes, i've shot an independence, i didnt really like it... i know some people that are die hard alien fans and would lick the scum off jack's boots just so he would talk to them... so i've had a chance to heard more about alien then i would like to...
my opionin is my own... i dont force it on others.. since this thread was about alien, i talked about why i didnt like the company... if the thread had been about another company i dont choose to support, i would have talked about why in there....
dont make this a "fuck jack rice" thread, otherwise i will shut it down... if you can express your opinion in a intelligent manner please do so, if not, shut the hell up and move on
Mini Orracle pump, Eclipse internals, Sanchez Machine pump kit and grip frame
Mossberg 500 ZMB
OSG Paintball biggest and best field in NH... show them some love
"I wish I had 2000 feet. So i could shove 500 of them up each of your asses!!!!" Red Foreman
#22
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:02 PM
OEFVeteran, on 30 December 2012 - 03:54 PM, said:
See that's the problem.
What I have said is that no one has "reasonably" proven me wrong.
Everyone said make a video - so I did.
Then some said well yo can't see enough of the gun - or it wasn't enough balls shot. Make another video - so I did.
IMO anyone reasonably looking at the videos - says - OK the shot is better.
It's a paintball - filled with liquid - there is a limit on how much spin can be put into the ball.
If you look at the 150 foot shot you will see the circle goes from about 36 inches to about 24 inches - doing the math that's 6 inches each way.
So a guy picks up the gun and shoot something 100 fee away - just rips off a string - and says I can't tell a difference.
Not being about to tell a difference - isn't "no difference"
Trouble is that I said a 36 inch pattern is 50% bigger than a 24 inch pattern. Let's do the math ;-) Half of 24 is 12
12 + 24 so by that definition other guns are 50% less accurate.
Well some players went nuts - it was like a was drowning kittens in my back yard.
Now I could have said Alien's are twice as accurate - by different way of doing the math.
Volume of a circle is the radius squared, times pi -- and pi being a constant, drop it.
12 x 12 = 144
18 x 18 = 324
So by that logic the sweep is way over twice as accurate.
But... holding the gun, you can't tell 6 inches on each side at 150 feet. So all of a sudden I'm "proven" to be a liar.
Truth be told - I showed what was happening in two videos - said nothing more than what is.
To get an even better shot you have to do what First Strike did. Cut the amount of paint down by 2/3's??? and impart huge spin.
Great! Much better shot - maybe 25 times more accurate. And 25 times the cost.
Sweep doesn't add to the cost and if you play with one awhile you will notice the difference.
Now what I say is "Spray and pray is OK" Just give your prayer the best chance to get answered.
This post has been edited by Jack Rice: 17 January 2013 - 10:04 PM
#23
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:06 PM
#25
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:37 PM
#26
Posted 17 January 2013 - 10:51 PM
#27
Posted 18 January 2013 - 12:22 AM
lovebunny, on 17 January 2013 - 10:51 PM, said:
Again, this is where the problems are, others making claims (or at least assumptions) for the gun that were not stated.
By imparting some spin on the ball - giving it an inherent rotation - it has a slight gyroscopic effect.
To repeat myself...yet again...
A knuckleball has no rotation so it picks up a rotation while in flight. That make it's trajectory more erratic.
We are throwing fastball - tighter flight - not curve balls.
It works, videos show it and hundreds of players know.
How important is the difference is - that is a matter of opinion.
#28
Posted 18 January 2013 - 12:38 AM
#29
Posted 18 January 2013 - 12:39 AM
#30
Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:39 AM
#31
Posted 19 January 2013 - 07:17 PM
#32
Posted 19 January 2013 - 08:31 PM
#33
Posted 19 January 2013 - 10:36 PM
#34
Posted 19 January 2013 - 11:35 PM
#35
Posted 20 January 2013 - 12:38 AM
gnarlee, on 19 January 2013 - 11:35 PM, said:
No Asa is like the mini's.
Pretty sure it's not an on/off, but was very easy to unscrew while pressurized.
http://www.techpb.co...1&#entry1905487
PM8 and Extcy: http://www.techpb.co...pic=215216&st=0
#36
Posted 20 January 2013 - 12:56 AM
#37
Posted 20 January 2013 - 01:09 AM
K_SodPb, on 20 January 2013 - 12:56 AM, said:
That's standard for a non-on/off.
http://www.techpb.co...1&#entry1905487
PM8 and Extcy: http://www.techpb.co...pic=215216&st=0
#38
Posted 20 January 2013 - 10:15 AM
cybermaniac15, on 20 January 2013 - 01:09 AM, said:
K_SodPb, on 20 January 2013 - 12:56 AM, said:
That's standard for a non-on/off.
yeah i know im just trying to help out
#39
Posted 20 January 2013 - 11:14 AM
#40
Posted 20 January 2013 - 06:52 PM
This post has been edited by Jack Rice: 21 January 2013 - 12:42 PM

Help





















