TechPB Forum: the world cup field layout - TechPB Forum

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

the world cup field layout its out...opinion's/thoughts

#21 User is offline   PacosTacos88 

  • hetero-flexible
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 6,004
  • Joined: 29-September 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rapid City, SD

Posted 05 July 2010 - 03:34 PM

View PostThepig, on 05 July 2010 - 12:44 PM, said:

EWWWW lol i dont like it



WTF???

#22 User is offline   Demetrius11 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 17-October 11

Posted 02 November 2011 - 06:22 AM

The layout seems really interesting and thrilling. I like the snake pattern the most. I heard about that Texas is soon going to release the Galveston Field Layout. Think there should be some more bunkers on the field. The lanes are very big, the field is very open and some positions look a little too dominant. A lot of the skill is being taken out of the game of paintball. By having teams walk the fields it really weeds out the really skilled teams. It puts more emphasis on technique and skill development. Its getting a bit boring because it all looks same. Bring back the elements of skill and surprise. And get rid of that God forsaken sideline coaching and if they have already keep it out of the game. Paintball wasn’t built on that concept. If you tell somone where players are where’s the anticipation and surprise and fun. Paintball has lost that aspect.

#23 User is offline   They Call Me Wonderbread 

  • I also love saving the money.....
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 961
  • Joined: 28-January 10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oooh Es Eh?

Posted 25 November 2011 - 11:30 PM

View PostDemetrius11, on 02 November 2011 - 06:22 AM, said:

The layout seems really interesting and thrilling. I like the snake pattern the most. I heard about that Texas is soon going to release the Galveston Field Layout. Think there should be some more bunkers on the field. The lanes are very big, the field is very open and some positions look a little too dominant. A lot of the skill is being taken out of the game of paintball. By having teams walk the fields it really weeds out the really skilled teams. It puts more emphasis on technique and skill development. Its getting a bit boring because it all looks same. Bring back the elements of skill and surprise. And get rid of that God forsaken sideline coaching and if they have already keep it out of the game. Paintball wasn't built on that concept. If you tell somone where players are where's the anticipation and surprise and fun. Paintball has lost that aspect.



Welcome to techpb, but you kinda just revived a two year old thread.B)
Posted Image
Cockerpunk - #1 awesome guy.

#24 User is offline   Coastermaniac 

  • Sophomore Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 494
  • Joined: 26-April 11
  • Gender:Male


Posted 08 December 2011 - 05:46 PM

View PostDemetrius11, on 02 November 2011 - 06:22 AM, said:

The layout seems really interesting and thrilling. I like the snake pattern the most. I heard about that Texas is soon going to release the Galveston Field Layout. Think there should be some more bunkers on the field. The lanes are very big, the field is very open and some positions look a little too dominant. A lot of the skill is being taken out of the game of paintball. By having teams walk the fields it really weeds out the really skilled teams. It puts more emphasis on technique and skill development. Its getting a bit boring because it all looks same. Bring back the elements of skill and surprise. And get rid of that God forsaken sideline coaching and if they have already keep it out of the game. Paintball wasn't built on that concept. If you tell somone where players are where's the anticipation and surprise and fun. Paintball has lost that aspect.



Posted Image

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users