ktap, on Jan 4 2009, 11:22 PM, said:
this is my logic, the loader puts out a certain amount of force, and each ball has 3 tangent points of contact, ball underneath or bolt, side of feedneck, and ball above. since each additional ball only adds a very small surface area, the net force of the loader is not significantly diminished. less time spent under this pressure the smaller the chance of a loading fracture, so a shorter stack seems to, in theory, reduce the amount of loading fracture. However i do agree with Troy that there may be an optimal stack length, but overall i think it would be relatively short.
i think the ideal stack length would be zero ...

Help




















