porting?
#21
Posted 19 December 2008 - 03:45 AM

Feedback
Sheridan KP2 and splatmaster for sale. http://www.techpb.co...howtopic=119951
PGP for sale. http://www.techpb.co...howtopic=120504
#22
Posted 19 December 2008 - 04:33 PM
Got a SLG? Join the SLG Owners Group
#23
Posted 19 December 2008 - 04:49 PM
A.E.D.paintballer, on Dec 19 2008, 03:33 PM, said:
here's the deal - simply testing a ported v a non-ported barrel won't guve us the answer we're trying to find. Take, for example, the two Trracer barrels I've owned. The stock one was aluminum. It was non-ported, 14" long and the bore was gigantic. The ported barrel I have was a TASO eliminator. It's a steel barrel, ported, much smaller bore and 12" long. Shooting those next to each other will tell you which barrel shoots better - but then determining what factor made that barrel shoot better is going to be very tough.
If you have two identical barrels - one ported and one non-ported - that's the rig we need to test this.
#24
Posted 19 December 2008 - 08:37 PM
Got a SLG? Join the SLG Owners Group
#25
#26
Posted 19 December 2008 - 09:16 PM
Got a SLG? Join the SLG Owners Group
#27
Posted 22 December 2008 - 02:44 PM
#28
Posted 22 December 2008 - 03:26 PM
#29
Posted 23 December 2008 - 02:53 AM
As far as I understand it, the great potential of porting is that it can decrease the pressure difference between the front and the back of the paintball before it leaves the barrel. Presumably, if there's still a high pressure behind the ball when it leaves the barrel, the gas will rapidly expand behind/around the paintball. This expansion is likely to be turbulent, and turbulent flow is fairly unpredictable, aka inconsistent. So if there's a large pressure behind the paintball when it leaves the barrel, this turbulent expansion will not only vary from shot to shot, but it will be strong enough to affect the flight path of the paintball, which will decrease the accuracy of the marker. By decreasing this pressure difference at the end of the barrel with effective porting, the expansion will be less forceful and should affect the flight path of the the paintball less --> greater accuracy.
This post has been edited by rkremer: 26 December 2008 - 01:20 PM
#30
Posted 26 December 2008 - 01:40 PM
Attached File(s)
-
IMG_0413___cropped.jpg (259.11K)
Number of downloads: 17
#31
Posted 05 January 2009 - 02:57 PM
how about just covering the porting?
sure it won't to be exactly like having no porting, but if the argument is that it allows to air to escape and keep from becoming turbulent ala Palmers argument(which i hope is correct since i coughed up an extra $45 for porting)
Then simply covering the porting with electrical tape(which will peel clean) should be enough for testing.
#32
Posted 05 January 2009 - 03:54 PM
Epshot, on Jan 5 2009, 01:57 PM, said:
how about just covering the porting?
sure it won't to be exactly like having no porting, but if the argument is that it allows to air to escape and keep from becoming turbulent ala Palmers argument(which i hope is correct since i coughed up an extra $45 for porting)
Then simply covering the porting with electrical tape(which will peel clean) should be enough for testing.
we've talked about this before - and the thing that would not change is the fact that the inner surface would then have essentially dents in it - which we don't know the effect of. It would be sorta like shooting an internally dimpled barrel.
#33
Posted 05 January 2009 - 06:59 PM
I would find it hard to believe that at the end of the barrel they would have much affect.
Besides i'm just talking a quick test, its easy enough to order a 12 inch ported and non ported barrel from Palmer Pursuit shop.
If someone wants to donate a 12 non ported palmers i'll be more than happy to compare it to my ported barrel
#34
Posted 05 January 2009 - 10:56 PM

Help


















