TechPB Forum: Virtue spring finger vs Hk Army epic speed feed - TechPB Forum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Virtue spring finger vs Hk Army epic speed feed which is better. Pros/Cons

#1 User is offline   marceldacs 

  • Junior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 937
  • Joined: 14-November 12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago,IL

Posted 25 January 2013 - 08:20 PM

I want to hear what you guys think about the hk army epic speed feed and the new virtue spring finger speed feed. I am deciding which to get for my rotor.

#2 User is offline   bassfisher 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,381
  • Joined: 16-November 12

Posted 25 January 2013 - 09:05 PM

I haven't used the hk one, but I have the spring finger one on my spire and it is fantastic. It literally can't let paint out and paint goes in very easy.
Carolina Riot Scenario Team

#3 User is offline   crPaliza 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,041
  • Joined: 15-September 11
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 January 2013 - 03:09 PM

Between the HK Epic speedfeed on my Z2 and the Virtue Spring Finger speedfeed on my Spire I can definitely tell you the the Virtue Spring Finger is better.

The HK Epic speedfeed is good. However the Virtue Spring Finger is just even better-doesn't let a single paintball drop-out and lets paint in very very easily. Hopefully, it's got the same technology on the Rotor, Z2, etc. :tup:

#4 User is offline   QuickLime 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 88
  • Joined: 04-January 13

Posted 26 January 2013 - 05:51 PM

I have the Epic and it doesn't drop more than 3 balls per test, and usually only 1-2, I don't have the Virtue so I can't compare but I don't think you can go wrong with either.
Posted Image
Feedback!1/0/0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users