[-ORaNGe-]

Well heres the thing, I'm getting sick of

"DARRRR WAHT HAPPENZ WHEN MAH WANR LOGG HITS 100%#?!~>"

Well, people ponder, they debate and they give answers when they don't really know for sure so let me field this one.

The percentage level of your warn means very little, for the most part the bar just puts a flag over the head of the "usual suspects" if you will. Every single action on a members warn log from a no warn level increase warn for a first time BST Rule infraction to a full on IP ban is judged on a case by case basis. It's up to the Mod what is going to happen to that member based on how bad the infraction is and what type of history they have. If someone flies off the handle and flames the shit out of someone and has nothing on their warn log and has been around a long while without incident they may get 2-3 days off and a "WTF was that?" PM, if they have a warn log with a rich history they could be looking at a week off or even an IP ban.

So basically what it comes down to is this, I've never seen a 100% warn level because nobody has made it there before because they were IP banned before that point. Quite simply if someone is just here to stir the shit we're not going to wait for them to get to 100%. An IP ban is given by the Admins who look over what's happened and decide from there, we've IP banned plenty of people who did something bad enough to earn it based on a single infraction where as some have gotten to say 70%. I'm hoping this puts an end to these "What happens if" threads.

[-ORaNGe-]

First

(I hate when people first my topics....)

[JBaller]

Damn you, I was waiting to get first on one of your topics.


FIRST AFTER ORANGE!!

Note from -ORaNGe-

Bragging about your warn level is a sure fire way to earn a ban, warns and bans are given to try to get you to smarten up. Bragging about your misdeeds are a good sign that not only have you not learned but that you're proud of being a pain in the ass, not a good idea.

This post has been edited by -ORaNGe-: 03 February 2011 - 10:46 PM

[TK-421]

Now, what would happen if I gave myself a warn level of 100%?

[JBaller]

what happens if Orange posts first on his own thread, but he hates when people post first? Especially on his thread?

[-ORaNGe-]

TK-421, on 03 February 2011 - 10:45 PM, said:

Now, what would happen if I gave myself a warn level of 100%?

Staff don't have a warn level bar, the last time one was added I banned Kitty with hilarious results!

JBaller, on 03 February 2011 - 10:47 PM, said:

what happens if Orange posts first on his own thread, but he hates when people post first? Especially on his thread?

A small South African child divides by zero and succeeds.

[CdnNinja]

I prefer my explanation involving the descension of sweet baby Raptor Jesus.

[nickp]

tl;dr. now here is a set of boobies

Spoiler

[TK-421]

-ORaNGe-, on 03 February 2011 - 10:50 PM, said:

TK-421, on 03 February 2011 - 10:45 PM, said:

Now, what would happen if I gave myself a warn level of 100%?

Staff don't have a warn level bar, the last time one was added I banned Kitty with hilarious results!

TOTAL WIN!

[sticktodrum]

Orange speaks the truth. My warn log is a mile long. I was (and still am) a huge pain in the ass. Unfortunately, most other pains in the ass aren't as funny or charming as I.

[Senior SL8R]

How did Kitty handle the ban? Please tell me there is some sort of video.

[JBaller]

Orange banning Kitty was the best thing that ever happened on the forum.

[Kin]

sticktodrum, on 03 February 2011 - 11:00 PM, said:

Orange speaks the truth. My warn log is a mile long. I was (and still am) a huge pain in the ass. Unfortunately, most other pains in the ass aren't as funny or charming as I.

I dream of a day I could be as witty as Stick.

[cavemag]

JBaller, on 03 February 2011 - 11:07 PM, said:

Orange banning Kitty was the best thing that ever happened on the forum.

Why'd she get banned?

[TK-421]

cavemag, on 04 February 2011 - 12:07 AM, said:

JBaller, on 03 February 2011 - 11:07 PM, said:

Orange banning Kitty was the best thing that ever happened on the forum.

Why'd she get banned?

Because he was basically handed the opportunity to, so he took it, is what I'm assuming. I would've done the same thing.

[cavemag]

TK-421, on 04 February 2011 - 12:09 AM, said:

cavemag, on 04 February 2011 - 12:07 AM, said:

JBaller, on 03 February 2011 - 11:07 PM, said:

Orange banning Kitty was the best thing that ever happened on the forum.

Why'd she get banned?

Because he was basically handed the opportunity to, so he took it, is what I'm assuming. I would've done the same thing.

So just some more bitchin mod shenanigans.

[TK-421]

cavemag, on 04 February 2011 - 12:10 AM, said:

TK-421, on 04 February 2011 - 12:09 AM, said:

cavemag, on 04 February 2011 - 12:07 AM, said:

JBaller, on 03 February 2011 - 11:07 PM, said:

Orange banning Kitty was the best thing that ever happened on the forum.

Why'd she get banned?

Because he was basically handed the opportunity to, so he took it, is what I'm assuming. I would've done the same thing.

So just some more bitchin mod shenanigans.

It's what we're here for.

[cavemag]

Coolio old techpb shens might just be coming back.

[Sasquatch]

Mods always get to have all the fun.

[cockerpunk]

yeah when the mods could warn/ban each other, it got pretty silly.