Scarab Arms new milisim marker
#41
Posted 01 March 2013 - 12:42 AM
#42
Posted 01 March 2013 - 12:44 AM
This post has been edited by andrewthewookie: 01 March 2013 - 12:45 AM

Hybrid SFT • 09 Impulse • HB REV-i • Macroless Mech Ion
Rotor • Grillz • PE 70/45 • Feedback - 21/0/0
Fear is the mind-killer
#43
Posted 01 March 2013 - 12:50 AM
#45
Posted 01 March 2013 - 12:58 AM
andrewthewookie, on 01 March 2013 - 12:53 AM, said:
Thank you for putting my worries to rest. Now for my next question. Where and when can I pick a box up so I can teat fire them through my dam an possibly sight it in for them. Because the price is definitely right. Maybe even test them against the fs to see how they compare.
#46
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:33 AM
#47
Posted 18 March 2013 - 11:04 PM
#49
Posted 19 March 2013 - 02:18 PM
Check us out on Facebook! Brew City Bomb Squad Paintball
#50
Posted 25 March 2013 - 12:29 PM
I ask because all I've been seeing are these preview videos and rumor mill speculatory comments about the rifle, there's not much to go on in terms of an actual comprehensive review of the marker. I would implore anyone who owns a TGR2 to do a video review so we can get some facts to go on.
Such as:
Deviations in FPS, chrono it with each spring from the kit.
Air consumption, both HPA and CO2.
Quality review of the parts.
Ergonomics. Not just at rest but understress. Magwell ease of reload.
Etc.
Just an average review. Yes, I know there are videos out there on the TGR2 but they are preview videos and the filmers were asked by Scarab Arms not to do a review until the marker was released, seeing as they were using a prototype. The TGR2 has been released for quite some time now, I hope someone (*couch* "Mike") will do a review soon.
#51
Posted 25 March 2013 - 12:43 PM
#52
Posted 25 March 2013 - 01:12 PM
PREDATOR 47, on 25 March 2013 - 12:43 PM, said:
I think they made the receiver larger so that the mag-well doesn't look chunky or just stick out randomly like a milsig. definatley agree the grip looks tiny compared to the rest of the gun.
This post has been edited by Billy Badass-RPF: 25 March 2013 - 02:52 PM
Am I the only one that when they see FEP QUEST they read it as FAP-QUEST then chuckle silently?
#53
Posted 25 March 2013 - 02:31 PM

Though I know where you're coming from. It's the extension from the gas block that makes the grip look small, nothing I can't over look. I feel that way when I look a a Milsig K series, to me they look like a 98 custom with a out of place magwell and a AR front shrouded barrel.
#54
Posted 25 March 2013 - 02:53 PM
Am I the only one that when they see FEP QUEST they read it as FAP-QUEST then chuckle silently?
#56
Posted 05 April 2013 - 07:45 AM
#57
Posted 05 April 2013 - 08:07 AM
bigx, on 05 April 2013 - 07:45 AM, said:
Looks like a SCAR, you say?

That's the TGR1 they are working on. And all SCAR's look the same, there's no difference between the H and L besides the caliber they are chambered for. The SCAR H shoots a 7.62mm, and the SCAR L shoots a 5.56mm.
#58
Posted 05 April 2013 - 08:35 AM
Quote
#59
Posted 05 April 2013 - 06:16 PM
#60
Posted 05 April 2013 - 11:25 PM
PREDATOR 47, on 05 April 2013 - 08:07 AM, said:
bigx, on 05 April 2013 - 07:45 AM, said:
Looks like a SCAR, you say?

That's the TGR1 they are working on. And all SCAR's look the same, there's no difference between the H and L besides the caliber they are chambered for. The SCAR H shoots a 7.62mm, and the SCAR L shoots a 5.56mm.
I said scar h because it is beefier and more elongated than the l version.

Help























