Jump to content


Alien Invasion vs. DP Fusion FX

  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

Poll: Invasion or FX (11 member(s) have cast votes)

Invasion or FX

  1. Invasion (11 votes [100.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 100.00%

  2. FX (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 MrBlackSmoke


    But it do

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 300 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Washington... not D.C., the real Washington.

Posted 03 December 2012 - 04:53 AM

I'm not asking about Eteks, I'm not asking about Axe's, and I'm sure as hell not asking about PMR's. JUST. THESE. TWO. GUNS.

I want to know:

1: How you think they match up on paper
2: How you think they match up on the field
3: Pros and Cons
4: If you've ever shot/owned one/both
5: Which gun you would pick of the two

"Hey! Do you wanna come back to my place and eat peanut butter off of a dead baby?"

Northwest Ballers Club

#2 Tick


    Senior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,197 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 December 2012 - 04:08 PM

Invasion blows the FX out of the fucking water just like Little Boy and Fat Man penetrated the Pacific Theater.

1.) On paper, with the Invasion you get much more bang for your buck more so than the FX

Efficiency :
- Invasion (10/11 Pods)
- FX (6/7) Pods)

- Invasion (I'm able to hit 18bps on semi Easy, Decent trigger feel)
- FX (Very stiff, Adjustable Fang/S- trigger, I personally hate this trigger)

"Bells and Whistles" :
- Both come with On/off ASAs, Clamping Feednecks, 2-piece Barrels.
- Invasion Is Macroline-less

Shot Quality:
- Both are honestly the Same

I have owned the Invasion and have used the FX extensively. Just as a comparison I have owned companies from almost every paintball company (PE, Dye, Macdev, BT, Empire, Tippmann, Tiberius, Alien, DP, PMI, etc)

Over all, I would pick the Invasion. The FX has very little, if anything over the Invasion. Also, the Invasion has a higher (used price/retail price) ratio than the FX


Hope this helped.

PayPal Verified | Over 300 + eBay transactions| 10/0/0

#3 PrimeTimePred


    Sophomore Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 358 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tallahassee, FL

Posted 04 December 2012 - 12:36 AM

LOVE my invasion... I never have to worry about it going down on the field, always reliable, and as stated above :efficient! Cant comment on the fx but if u get an invasion i know for a fact u wont be dissapointed with its performance

#4 Symptomz



  • Players Club
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,041 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Texas

Posted 04 December 2012 - 01:34 PM

1: How you think they match up on paper - The invasion has a nice trigger, is macroless, kicks a little less, basically the only thing the FX has over the invasion is the OLED board.
2: How you think they match up on the field - Invasion is marcoless so it's easier to manuver, has a nice low profile feedneck. I don't like how the RAPS asa on the FX comes out of the side instead of the front. It gets in my way.
3: Pros and Cons - Refer back to #1 and #2
4: If you've ever shot/owned one/both - Yes, I've owned an invasion and played a couple games with an FX.
5: Which gun you would pick of the two - Invasion hands down.

Answers in red.

Edited by Symptomz, 04 December 2012 - 01:47 PM.

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users