Jump to content


Photo

geo


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 djander98

djander98

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 20 posts

Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:26 PM

geo 2.1 or geo 3 my first high end any help

#2 xmagman

xmagman

    Sophomore Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 399 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Okinawa Japan

Posted 05 February 2013 - 09:43 PM

There really isnt a whole lot of difference between these two. Unless you can get the Geo3 used for $900 or less it isnt worth it. If you want pretty much the same peformance and want to save a few bucks get the 2.1 and call it a day.
-X

Shooting MacDev guns since 2006!

#3 BurningPlaydoh

BurningPlaydoh

    Blow-dough'ed

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,776 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Twin Cities, MN

Posted 05 February 2013 - 10:42 PM

My question is, why a Geo?

#4 dirtraven

dirtraven

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 39 posts

Posted 06 February 2013 - 01:39 PM

like xmagman said, performance is very little difference between the 2 and 3. I owned a 2.1 and now a 3. What u do get with the 3.0 is a reinforced trigger frame and rubber back grip like the ego11. A rubber tip bolt, which I used once, but prefer the original bolt (2.1 is the same face) since i never broke any paint with it when I shot my 2.1. U do get an inline filter now in the 3.0. Main reason I went for a 3.0 was I wanted the Vicious milling and the VGeo2.1 was just a jewel on the body. The SFR is so-so IMO.

Edited by dirtraven, 06 February 2013 - 01:40 PM.


#5 NBTIppy

NBTIppy

    Sterling

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,479 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wanderer

Posted 06 February 2013 - 10:05 PM

My question is, why a Geo?


Helpful...

To the OP, if you have the money to spare get the 3, if not skip the 2.1 and go right down to the 2 and save yourself $100-$150




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users